Last Updated:
The trainer really adapted the training to our level and took a lot of time and efforts to make sure the presentation was well adapted.
Interactivity, time for self-contained programming. I learn easier if I have the chance to find out the answer and not just telling me it. It was also a very good thing that the training was well-planned, we kept coffee pauses and the training did not lose my attention. The trainer had very deep knowledge in C++, we felt we could ask anything.
The knowledge of the trainer. He was able to answer all of my questions, even questions about our platform. He also continued to help until we all understood the material.
Good examples, focus on most useful material
The flexiblity in the training.
One on one in person time to cover questions that werent initially part of the training
The topic is very interesting specially when the trainer started to introduce the basic functions, panels and shortcut keys. We really enjoyed the good features of 2D and 3D tools that allow the team to easily toggle and getting the idea of what the board will actually look like after assembled.
Symbol, Footprint and Schematic creation
A relaxed environment and a steady pace.
The trainer was very interactive and steadily paced.
Maybe more exercises could be better for lerning but the time was to little
I understood the process of the operating system and how do we link all factors together information of network as well so now I have an obvious and full picture about what is going on these computers how they communicate with each others ultimately gained knowledge about the most important operating system which is Linux and how do we implement our own embedded Linux
The content. This was very new for me so learned a lot.
I thought the content (both theory and practical) was excellent, and exactly what we were wanting/expecting. The exercises were challenging but achievable.
Just getting off the ground and doing some basic things was super useful
relaxed and informal environment plenty of help during worked examples
I enjoyed the training was delivered by someone with experience in the field.
I found the balance of "white board" teaching versus practical "hands-on" learning was just right for an Arduino introductory course, and the pace was also appropriate.
Rod's style was entertaining.
Practical work
Trainer was really kind and knowledgeable, going the extra mile to explain things that I didn't know
The trainer was very knowledgeable and live code examples on a "real" hardware device with a display were great.
I liked the fact that the training was more induced as prepared chaos. this means that the training took a structured life of its' own, but had ample room for learning and mistake making.
Trainer's way of explaining
He answers my questions very well explained.
